Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by akash – India, 2019-02-23 09:39 (2683 d 20:32 ago) – Posting: # 19967
Views: 8,200

Why Bioequivalence testing makes use of the 90 CI why not 95 CI which gives more accuracy?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
278 visitors (0 registered, 278 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5