Pilot or pivotal ? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-06-29 22:53 (2564 d 07:37 ago) – Posting: # 19000
Views: 16,207

Hi Olhbe

❝ Isn't the common practice to first test T1 and T2 vs. R in a pilot study (and I will not get into a debate on whether alpha correction would be needed), select one of the two test formulations, and then test it in a pivotal study in the usual way ? How often do you see both test formulations directly tested in a pivotal study ?


❝ OK, maybe if the product has a very low variability and the number of subjects remains very low, it could make sense and save time to directly go for the pivotal. Any experience ?


Damn. We did pivotals 4-way crossover 3T vs R before! :surprised: R&D said no time and material was cheap! :confused: I said "Ooooookay..."
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,680 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5