Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Significant digits or decimal places [General Statistics]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2008-03-26 14:15 (6656 d 15:03 ago) – Posting: # 1721
Views: 13,507

Dear all,

i wonder about the precision of the pharmacokinetic metrics used in bioequivalence studies.

Can anybody enlighten me?

How do you act in this respect? Do you have any standard regarding the significant digits or decimal places in reporting AUC, Cmax and so on?

Does anybody know a regulative guideline?

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Significant digits or decimal placesd_labes 2008-03-26 13:15
- Significant digits (IMHO) Helmut 2008-03-26 16:12
  - Significant digits or not significant digits ... d_labes 2008-03-27 10:10
    - Significant digits or not significant digits ... Helmut 2008-03-27 20:43
      - Significant digits or not significant digits ... d_labes 2008-03-28 11:00

Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
146 visitors (0 registered, 146 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution. Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz

Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Significant digits or decimal places [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

Significant digits or decimal places [General Statistics]