1–2α CI and TOST at α 0.05 [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by GM – India, 2017-03-28 08:50 (3355 d 12:09 ago) – Posting: # 17190
Views: 12,164

❝ ❝ If the 90%CI is one side of hundred, i.e. either (85.00-98.00) or (102.00-119.00) then there should be significant treatment effect. Is this statement correct...?


❝ Absolutely.


Hi Helmut,

Thank you for the reply.

I was also found that most of the cases above statement is correct only. But I have a situation where treatment effect is not significant even the calculated 90%CI falls one side of hundred. Is it possible..?

Actually I was used Proc GLM in SAS for this 2×2 crossover study with the model statement mentioned below:

model logCmax = Sequence Period Form Cohort Form*Cohort Subject(Sequence*Cohort)/ SS3;

Cohort was mentioned as a fixed effect because the study conducts in two groups.

The fixed effects mentioned in above the model will effect the treatment effect...? Please explain.

Regards,
GM.

Best Regards,
GM

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
484 visitors (0 registered, 484 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5