Be creative! (#2) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-12-21 02:09 (3843 d 00:30 ago) – Posting: # 15753
Views: 7,216

Hi Mittyri & BE-proff,

❝ ICH E3 states (and the famous letter from Center of Expertise dated 11.12.13 repeated it):

12.4.2 Evaluation of Each Laboratory Parameter

❝ The necessary evaluation of laboratory values must in part be determined by the results seen, but, in general, the following analyses should be provided. For each analysis, comparison of the treatment and control groups should be carried out, as appropriate, and as compatible with study size. In addition, normal laboratory ranges should be given for each analysis.


Should be. A comparison given the sample sizes in BE? Forget it. See again the Q&A(R1) to ICH E3 (remember this post?). It’s up to you to adapt the report according to the study’s needs.

❝ BTW I don't know what kind of analysis do the assessors like to see in CSR ;-)


May I ask: What’s the ominous “letter from Center of Expertise”?

❝ Even when I provided just graphs of changes without any analysis of changes I got no LoDs.


I always provide only the original pre- and post-study exams and summary statistics. No comparisons, no bloody shift tables, no graphs, nada.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
366 visitors (0 registered, 366 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5