S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-02-02 17:31 (4152 d 18:32 ago) – Posting: # 14354
Views: 44,337

Angus,

❝ John: You have 71 subjects (69 df) for Wt: I have 69 subjects (67 df) ......the 2 subjects you include in SAS and I exclude in Phoenix are 24 and 31. So the question arises what are the rules in your code that allow you to include them in SAS.


Before we proceed. Are you in agreement with my subject listing for Dlatr and ilat? I looked at Dlatt (wt) listing and the SAS dataset and noted the following:

Subject 24 only has TTR (missing one R), and subject 31 has RTT (missing one R). Why would Winnonlin drop these two subjects? Both have 2 Ts and hence Dlatt should've been calculated just like the rest of the qualified subjects.

John

P.S. I am still waiting for Helmut's response the H and u calculations...

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
160 visitors (0 registered, 160 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5