S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2015-01-31 00:24 (4155 d 19:08 ago) – Posting: # 14333
Views: 44,698

❝ I pulled these counts off the SAS computational datasets (ilat, dlat for test, dlat for reference) which show the # of subjects used for each computation. You can use this to check and see if Winnonlin used the same subjects per computation?


Dlatt(for computation of Wt)

subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31

32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60

62,63,64,65,66,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78


John: You have 71 subjects (69 df) for Wt: I have 69 subjects (67 df) ......the 2 subjects you include in SAS and I exclude in Phoenix are 24 and 31. So the question arises what are the rules in your code that allow you to include them in SAS.

Excluding then in Phoenix follows the code in Phoenix.

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
184 visitors (0 registered, 184 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5