α vs. 1–α [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-01-15 01:54 (4167 d 17:13 ago) – Posting: # 14292
Views: 45,545

Hi John,

❝ You guys have fun. That's why I like SAS more. I have more control (but most of the time less control!!) :-D


I think all these systems (SAS, PHX, R) can be nasty beasts. They love to be treated carefully and hate quick-shots. What I missed:

[image]

For H2/H3 1–α (like in RSABE), but for H1 α… Dammit!

What I have so far:

σ²D 0.007971169

    Eq               Hq              Uq
E1  0.165897781  H1  0.232840079  U1 0.004481271
E2 -0.058269837  H2 -0.046281491  U2 0.000143720
E3 -0.099656775  H3 -0.072837204  U3 0.000719289
Eq 0.007971169                  ∑Uq 0.005344281

Hσ²D = 0.007971169 + √0.005344281 = 0.081075759


My 0.081075759 ≠ your 0.073582621. What a mess!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
102 visitors (0 registered, 102 guests [including 34 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5