S×F vari­­ance: Followup [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2015-01-12 21:56 (4169 d 13:29 ago) – Posting: # 14272
Views: 45,605

❝ ❝ That is what I have. Please can you check?


❝ I pulled these counts off the SAS computational datasets (ilat, dlat for test, dlat for reference) which show the # of subjects used for each computation. You can use this to check and see if Winnonlin used the same subjects per computation?


MT
No; it did not Phoenix has 69 pairs used for data analysis and 9 subjects missing(11,20,61,67, 69,71, 42, 31 and 24.) My avoe mesage is in error. For SAS you have 24 and 31 retained compared with Phoenix. So you have 71 subjects n the calculation.

Dlatt(for computation of Wt)

subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31

32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,

59,60

62,63,64,65,66,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78


Dlatr(for computation of Wr)

subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30

32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60

62,63,64,65,66,68,69,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78


Ilat(for computation of Wi)

subject 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,33

34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,62,63,64,65

66,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78


Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
133 visitors (0 registered, 133 guests [including 42 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5