S×F vari­­ance: Typo. [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-01-08 18:32 (4180 d 00:40 ago) – Posting: # 14257
Views: 45,988

(edited on 2015-01-08 19:49)

Hi Helmut,

He basically said computation #2 is pointless at this stage. He said the 0.03 is NOT a criteria, it's an "allowance". In that case then Computation #2 is just for data collection... Also I brought up the S2D computation suggested by Ana (see my post to Angus in this thread) using ABE output (G-matrix). He said it is nonsense (I assume I interpreted the equations correctly to him. I did tell him her computation involves using between-subject variances).

Nope, no Absinthe, just a glass of wine :-)
On another note, ever tried a liquor called "Ever Clear"? 190 Proof... :surprised:

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
196 visitors (0 registered, 196 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5