S×F vari­­ance [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2015-01-06 19:48 (4181 d 11:55 ago) – Posting: # 14228
Views: 46,071

Helmut: my interest in Phoenix was to get within subject test variance (WT instead of WR. Following your suggestion I copied and pasted "Prepare data sets for analysis" to create a second one.

Therefore I changed the code over in the second one from R2 and R1 to T2 and T1 as shown in the photo below: Subsequently there was little changes required {just to the text} to get WT]

[image]

it seemed to work well: I note that the value obtained (0.1186) was slightly higher than John's value (0.11654). Of course the WR information is retained in the original "Prepare Data sets for analysis"

I cannot see anything wrong; it seemed to be straight forward, but I am interested in why John got a different value in SAS. I think he experienced a problem doing this in Phoenix. I hope he see this.


Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
167 visitors (0 registered, 167 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5