S×F vari­­ance [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-12-24 02:39 (4197 d 18:12 ago) – Posting: # 14155
Views: 46,788

THANKS JOHN: Allow me to point our to you that from Barbara Davit's article if the regular BE test applies on any of the metrics (<0.294) then you do not use the reference scaled approach. You simply use the average BE test and discontinue the interest in RSABE. So that means that upper confidence interval of sigma D2 does not apply in cases where average BE is used for a metric?...yes?

The metric most at at risk with Concerta is the latest one ( I am thinking).

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
126 visitors (0 registered, 126 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5