Doubt about analysis [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by john john – Spain, 2014-09-26 11:16 (4285 d 11:00 ago) – Posting: # 13589
Views: 7,392

John John

We had made a bioequivalence with more than 70 subjects divided into 7 groups. The statistical analysis has been like a normal bioequivalence. Regulatory agency asks us to include the covariable "group".
Is this normal?
From which number of groups/subjects would there be necessary to include it?
It woul be possible to justify doesn't to do it?
Thanks

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
143 visitors (0 registered, 143 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5