Non-informative “profiles” [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by fno Homepage – Belgium, 2014-03-11 16:52 (4478 d 02:52 ago) – Posting: # 12599
Views: 11,696

Dear Helmut, dear Ohlbe,

Thank you so much already for your feed-back!

❝ Fabrice stated that this was not a BE study. I think we need more information.


The context is the following:The study is thus not at risk :cool: from a PK point of view.
But I was nevertheless interested on what would be the suggestions to best handle such a situation from a pure statistical point of view.
For PK, the potential impact is on the steady-state vs single dose comparison, but you can also simply consider the computation of the descriptive geometric mean Cmax and AUC... how to best deal with a zero value?

As I already mentioned, it is not the first time I encounter this kind of issue.
I am therefore thinking to describe the handling of such cases in our SOPs, which we can refer to when nothing is specifically planned in the protocol or in the SAP :clap:.

Many thanks!

Kind regards,
Fabrice

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
116 visitors (0 registered, 116 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have never in my life learned anything
from any man who agreed with me.    Dudley Field Malone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5