BE and drop out subjects Phoenix [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2014-01-24 01:02 (4524 d 22:03 ago) – Posting: # 12252
Views: 9,873

We have implemented a 3 way cross-over balanced design (Williams, 6 sequences) for a fed, fasted, sprinkled on food bioequivalence study. It is not a highly variable drug (CV ~15%). The study has gone well and the results are unambiguous. We did lose one subject at PERIOD 3. I am wondering whether I should exclude the other two treatments for this subject prior to BE data analysis in Phoenix. Or should I include all the data I have. Or indeed do the data analysis both ways.

This work is a registration study and will be submitted here to the FDA.

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
114 visitors (0 registered, 114 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have never in my life learned anything
from any man who agreed with me.    Dudley Field Malone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5