Passing SD and Failing MD [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by luvblooms  – India, 2013-11-29 19:57 (4579 d 23:20 ago) – Posting: # 11991
Views: 16,672

Hi HS,

❝ That’s an interesting story! Were the PEs in the MD study shifted to the same direction (i.e., were in MD the ratios also <100%)? How did the CVs “behave”?


Yes, the ratio's were on lower side.The T/R ratio was ~87 for Cmin (lower CI was 76.8) and Same was the case for AUCtss (~89 with range of 78-99).

CVs were almost similar to that of SD.

When we were trying to understand the reason of failure, one thing that draw our attention was the lower AUC values in SD. And this lower accumulations might have lead to the lower Cmin and AUCtss.

Further modified the formula in order to achieve AUC (by increasing its solubility in lower GIT) and dosed it for SD and BINGO!!! Cmax ~96% AUC= 95 (still was not able to reach 100). When the same was dosed for MD, it passed with flying colors ;-) (Cmin and AUCtss ratios were 93 and 94 respectively)

❝ The only case I know from the literature is quite old.*



Read this article long back, need to refresh the memory :-D

Regards

~A happy Soul~

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
127 visitors (0 registered, 127 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have never in my life learned anything
from any man who agreed with me.    Dudley Field Malone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5