Is it still unclear :( ? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Anu – India, 2013-08-28 11:08 (4679 d 05:50 ago) – Posting: # 11365
Views: 7,677

Hi Helmut,

❝ This doesn’t makes sense to me. Do you mean data for a test product (in % of the reference)?


Actually the 90% CI is for the test-reference

❝ Duno. I don’t believe in these numbers – where do they come from?


I don't have any raw data, just got this confidence interval (on -20% to +20%) scale from my boss. And its a two way cross over study with 21 subjects. On the basis of which my objective is to calculate the sample size. Which I will be doing with R software and the FARTSSIE Excel sheet. So, it came in my mind why not to transform this CI into (80.00 to 125.00)%. It should be possible? Does there exist any such transformation relation between these two different CI scales i.e (80.00 to 125.00)% and (-20.00 to +20.00)?

Thanks & Regards
Anu

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
156 visitors (0 registered, 156 guests [including 35 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5