Question about Treatment Effect [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-08-14 01:30 (4696 d 16:55 ago) – Posting: # 11272
Views: 4,112

Hi all,

Question. From a 3-way (T1 vs T2 vs R) study, for Cmax:
  1. A is BE to R for Cmax (Ratio ~100%; 90%CI ~94-110%; pooled CV 27%)
  2. B is not BE to R (Ratio ~121%; 90%CI ~112-131; pooled CV 27%)
  3. A significant treatment effect was observed from the PROC GLM model output.
Obviously the significant treatment effect was caused by B-R, but how do you defend it?

Thanks
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
125 visitors (0 registered, 125 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5