BE and gender [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2013-06-15 17:10 (4758 d 18:58 ago) – Posting: # 10801
Views: 6,302

Dr._Dan: Thank you for directing me towards this interesting discussion. It appears to me that the trend of the results of the two studies indicate to me that exposure of the drug in males is higher than females for both studies. It just so happens that in the second study the difference was less pronounced. No; it is not a statistical artifact. The formulations are different.
I am thinking that we have a modified release formulation here and the rate of absorption of the drug is different between the two formulations (test and Reference). The test formulation is slower absorbing?
Could it be that the difference in genders is due to the more pronounced metabolism of the drug by females relative to males?

Are you allowed to say if the drug is highly metabolized?

Angus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
349 visitors (0 registered, 349 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge.    Charles Darwin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5