BE and gender [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-06-11 22:47 (4761 d 20:43 ago) – Posting: # 10772
Views: 6,908

Hi Angus,

❝ The ANOVA p value was 0.08 so the gender effect was not significant. Under what circumstances would one use the BE data analysis with gender in the model.


This is in my opinion just like a group effect. I wouldn't worry too much about a plain gender effect; in CO studies it will be a between-factor anyway, and genders do differ in terms of size, shape, plasma volume and just about anything else. Gender x Treatment is another matter; it would be a very surprising finding if it comes out significant and could in my opinion be followed up by additional questions; ideally this is only academic - wouldn't want to have a study with [Women, Test] being different from [Women, Ref]= [Men, Test]=[Men, Ref] and so on.
Since we don't deal with group x treatment effects in other types of studies I think one could along the same lines often justify a model without gender effects unless there is a specific reason to think otherwise. Same could be said for hair color, music preference or anamnetic presence of altitude sickness among relatives.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
158 visitors (0 registered, 158 guests [including 30 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5