Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design [General Statistics]

posted by im.sagark – India, 2013-06-06 15:17 (4756 d 05:38 ago) – Posting: # 10746
Views: 9,248

❝ In that case my guess is that you do not get the right type III SS.

Yes. I got the right Type III SS as I compared it with Minitab output.

❝ You need to fit the whole model and note the SS, then the model without the effect in question and note the SS. The type III SS contribution for the effect in question is the difference of the two SS values. Sequence is a little nasty and peculiar - to get it right you may need to compensate for the nesting.

How can we compensate the SS??
I have still confusion.
Please try to elaborate.

Regards,
Sagar Khandagale.

—
Regards,
Sagar Khandagale.

Complete thread:

Sum of squares for Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design im.sagark 2013-06-06 09:16
- SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design ElMaestro 2013-06-06 11:13
  - SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design im.sagark 2013-06-06 11:20
    - SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design im.sagark 2013-06-06 11:31
      - SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design Dr_Dan 2013-06-06 12:21
        
        SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design im.sagark 2013-06-06 13:38
  - SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design im.sagark 2013-06-06 11:45
    - SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design ElMaestro 2013-06-06 12:06
      - SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design im.sagark 2013-06-06 12:27
        
        SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design ElMaestro 2013-06-06 12:55
        
        SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Designim.sagark 2013-06-06 13:17
        
        SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design ElMaestro 2013-06-06 17:25
        
        SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design im.sagark 2013-06-07 05:54

SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

SS, Unbalanced 3X3 crossover Design [General Statistics]