Anti-Coagulant Vacutainer volume Vs Blood Sample Volume [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-02-06 13:44 (4892 d 10:01 ago) – Posting: # 9977
Views: 6,159

Hello Akinapally,

❝ What is the impact on the study out come(Bio-analytical results) for a BA/BE study in the following case.


❝ Case1: If i use 3ml K3EDTA vacutainer (if i don't have 2ml vacutainer) for 2ml sample?


If you are able to somehow collect 2 ml into a 3 ml tube:
The plasma you process may contain 50% more K3EDTA, this change could at least in theory be significant to the downstream processing of the sample. I would advise that this phenomenon be evaluated e.g. as a kind of ruggedness test in the bioanalytical validation.

If you collect 3 ml (or what could subjectively by others than yourself be considered a quantitatively larger amount than 2 ml) into a 3 ml tube:
While the bioanalytical result may not be affected per se, I'd have some potential worry since the protocol would usually specify that you are collecting 2 ml samples and XYZ ml in total per period. Collecting more may be a protocol violation.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
319 visitors (0 registered, 319 guests [including 44 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5