Abnormal lab parameters [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-03-04 17:51 (5589 d 16:36 ago) – Posting: # 6704
Views: 5,169

Dear Suchit,

again: Please follow the Forum's Policy in the future - you have been notified numerous times.
Is it really that complicated to say “hello”

❝ If in safety evaluation any laboratory parameter will be out of range then we will file AE for that correct.


Yes.

❝ Now my question is it will be consider as a post study period 2 AE or after completion of AE study ?


I don’t know your SOPs. Most people would consider them as post study - but this is nitpicking, of course. I came only once across a case where lab evaluations (besides screening) were performed at hospitalizations and after both periods…

❝ and what we will write in study medication ? Period 2 treatment or both the test and reference ?


Any cross-over study should be designed in such a way that no residual effects of period 1 are substantial in period 2 (= no carry-over). Following this rationale you should code the AE to the treatment of period 2, IMHO.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
110 visitors (0 registered, 110 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5