blood sampling [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by ratnakar1811 – India, 2009-12-10 08:05 (6037 d 08:52 ago) – Posting: # 4452
Views: 25,805

Dear HS and forum members,

❝ Me too! I’m always suggesting to use actual sampling times, but everybody should be aware that the crucial point is not the method of calculation (actual vs planned), but the location of sampling points.

❝ IMHO the most important region is around Cmax.


This topic was discussed long back, but recently i have received a letter from WHO for using actual time for PK analysis, as earlier we were considering schedule time if the deviation is <10% and for deviation >10% actual time.

Generally we have a window of 2 min for inhouse sampling and for ambulatory samples we have a window of 1 hr mentioned in the protocol, now my question is should we use actual time for all the deviation irrespective as mentioned above (i.e. even the sample is delayed by 1 min also) or for only those samples for which protocol deviation required to be filed?

Currently we have mentioned actual time to be considered for all the deviations even it is for 1 min also.

Your views will be highly aprreciated.

Regards,
Ratnakar

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
155 visitors (0 registered, 155 guests [including 34 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5