IRB [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Preet – 2009-03-25 11:06 (5893 d 18:16 ago) – Posting: # 3402
Views: 5,396

Hi M. Vasu,

It is highly impossible that any IRB/IEC disapproves clinical study without valid reason (safety concerns, efficacy etc.); even regulatory authorities (like US FDA, EMEA, ANVISA etc) won't follow this practice. If they are disapproving your clinical study, then they must provide valid reason for disapproval.

In your case there can be two possibilities
1) IRB wants further information/clarification for its approval or
2) Simply disapproving your clinical study without reason.

In first case:
If they provide their views or they want corrections in the proposed clinical study (protocol), just incorporate this extra information, amend your clinical study protocol and resubmit for approval (to same IRB).

In second case:
If they are disapproving your clinical study without providing any reason, then you are having every right to approach another IRB.

"The show must go on"

Regards,
Preet

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
137 visitors (0 registered, 137 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Only dead fish go with the current.    Scuba divers' proverb

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5