IRB [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Preet – 2009-03-25 11:06 (6294 d 03:36 ago) – Posting: # 3402
Views: 6,720

Hi M. Vasu,

It is highly impossible that any IRB/IEC disapproves clinical study without valid reason (safety concerns, efficacy etc.); even regulatory authorities (like US FDA, EMEA, ANVISA etc) won't follow this practice. If they are disapproving your clinical study, then they must provide valid reason for disapproval.

In your case there can be two possibilities
1) IRB wants further information/clarification for its approval or
2) Simply disapproving your clinical study without reason.

In first case:
If they provide their views or they want corrections in the proposed clinical study (protocol), just incorporate this extra information, amend your clinical study protocol and resubmit for approval (to same IRB).

In second case:
If they are disapproving your clinical study without providing any reason, then you are having every right to approach another IRB.

"The show must go on"

Regards,
Preet

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
174 visitors (0 registered, 174 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5