Missing values [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2008-07-31 12:38 (6542 d 12:49 ago) – Posting: # 2113
Views: 20,773

❝ ❝ "Exclusion of data can never be accepted on basis of stat analysis or ❝ for PK reasons alone."

❝ IMHO defining ‘critical regions’ of the profile in the protocol is not a bad idea. No “[…] PK reasons alone”, but common sense added!

❝ If one wants to come up with a hard-core justification of the ‘critical regions’: perform PK modeling (pilot study or literature data) and plot the partial derivatives of parameters vs. time; extremes (min/max) will indicate most influential time points. Remark: never seen this in a protocol – maybe freaks like me do it at home. :cool:


Hi,

Dat's a good point to make, HS.
But I think the current trend is towards more 'cook book' and less science or judgment. It might be difficult to make a recipe for this situation which is not based on some degree of subjectivity (subjectivity- sometimes disguised as 'common sense' - is something that can be tricky to handle for regulators as well as applicants, I think). Let me emphasize, I like the idea nevertheless.
However, I could also imagine regulators thinking "Plan the study well, make sure it is robust towards 'eventualities'. If the loss of two samples (or whatever) is remotely/reasonably possible then of course a study should be planned so that such an event does not scr¤w it all up. If a study is planned well it will not be necessary to fiddle around with data." or something along those lines.

N'est-ce pas?

EM.

--
Edit: Full quote removed. Please see this post! [Jaime]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
271 visitors (0 registered, 271 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5