Suitable matrix? [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-07-01 17:53 (4008 d 07:57 ago) – Posting: # 15006
Views: 8,341

Dear both,

I’m aware that both the FDA (in a guidance) and the EMA (in current practice) ask for measurement in serum. We all know that serum (or plasma) concentrations are a surrogate of the concentrations at the site of action (which in general is not accessible).
However, Fe stimulates the production of erythrocytes in the bone marrow (hey, the site of action!) of Fe-deficient patients. In my understanding measuring in whole blood would be more reasonable.
Just my 2 ¢.

On another note using stable isotope labelled products (57Fe and/or 58Fe) could help in distinguishing endo­genous from dosed Fe.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
127 visitors (0 registered, 127 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5