Backups: rather not [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-02-03 15:54 (4163 d 23:24 ago) – Posting: # 14367
Views: 6,770

Hi Mittyr,

❝ 1. Backups. […]


❝ For me it looks strange. What do you think about this procedure?


Outdated. We abandoned it 20 years ago. Nowadays you should start with the estimated sample size plus some additional subjects according to the expected dropout rate. Even, if you don’t add subjects the loss in power is less than most people think. See this thread; you could loose a lot of subjects until power substantially decreases.
Detlew implemented some useful functions in PowerTOST last October. Try:

library(PowerTOSt)
pa.ABE(CV=0.21, minpower=0.7)


In your example (n 22) with five (!) dropouts you still have 72% power.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
270 visitors (0 registered, 270 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5