Imbalanced cross-overs [Study Performance]
Hi Khaoula,
We recently have submitted a paper to the AAPS J (which currently is under review). It seems that Kinetica is not able to correctly deal with imbalanced studies. I strongly suggest to use another software (we got correct results in R, Phoenix/WinNonlin, EquivTest/PK, and SAS).
I don’t understand what you mean here. The limit for HVDs/HVDPs is 30% CV of the reference obtained in a replicate design. CVintra from a 2×2 serves only as a hint of a highly variable reference (since pooled from CVWR and CVWT).
A posteriori (aka post-hoc) power is irrelevant in BE. Stop calculating it.
Either the study passes, or not.
Subject effects are normal in a cross-over. It tells you that subjects differ – well, they should…
If evaluated by Kinetica, yes.
❝ […] we collected the results of 15 subjects and we analyzed Kinetica without protocol for the management of dropouts
![[image]](img/uploaded/image4.gif)
❝ we had abberants results: for Cmax CV = 0,03 % for hight variable drug …
I don’t understand what you mean here. The limit for HVDs/HVDPs is 30% CV of the reference obtained in a replicate design. CVintra from a 2×2 serves only as a hint of a highly variable reference (since pooled from CVWR and CVWT).
❝ power: 50% …
A posteriori (aka post-hoc) power is irrelevant in BE. Stop calculating it.
Either the study passes, or not.
❝ with subject effect and subject/sequence effect
Subject effects are normal in a cross-over. It tells you that subjects differ – well, they should…
❝ […] the exclusion of subject N 15 have impact in the result of the study?
If evaluated by Kinetica, yes.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- randomization khaoula 2014-06-06 14:04
- Imbalanced cross-oversHelmut 2014-06-06 14:47
- Imbalanced cross-overs khaoula 2014-06-06 16:03
- CV 0.03%? Helmut 2014-06-07 13:52
- Imbalanced cross-overs jag009 2014-06-09 15:36
- Imbalanced cross-overs khaoula 2014-06-09 22:07
- Bag full of bugs Helmut 2014-06-10 00:37
- Randomisation? ElMaestro 2014-06-10 01:00
- Randomisation? Helmut 2014-06-10 14:53
- Randomisation? khaoula 2014-06-11 00:17
- Problems resolved? Helmut 2014-06-11 02:01
- Problems resolved? khaoula 2014-07-24 13:36
- corrected data in PHX/WNL Helmut 2014-07-27 01:37
- Problems resolved? khaoula 2014-07-24 13:36
- Problems resolved? Helmut 2014-06-11 02:01
- Randomisation? khaoula 2014-06-11 00:17
- Randomisation? Helmut 2014-06-10 14:53
- Randomisation? ElMaestro 2014-06-10 01:00
- Which version of Kinetica? Helmut 2014-06-11 19:51
- Which version of Kinetica? khaoula 2014-06-12 00:41
- Which version of Kinetica? khaoula 2014-07-25 00:49
- adjusted means (aka LSMs) Helmut 2014-07-27 02:23
- adjusted means (aka LSMs) khaoula 2014-08-25 21:41
- adjusted means (aka LSMs) Helmut 2014-07-27 02:23
- Bag full of bugs Helmut 2014-06-10 00:37
- Imbalanced cross-overs khaoula 2014-06-09 22:07
- Imbalanced cross-overs khaoula 2014-06-06 16:03
- Imbalanced cross-oversHelmut 2014-06-06 14:47