Snafued! [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-09-09 23:55 (4668 d 20:11 ago) – Posting: # 11466
Views: 12,433

Hi Ohlbe & John,

Unbelievable snafu:
3:30 ⇒ 4:11
4:00 ⇒ 4:02

I hope they had no barcode-/CDMS in place. Such data might foul up the entire data base. At least in our validation we did not challenge the system with a later sample harvested earlier than the ‘previous’ one. Wacky.

❝ With the CRO, I have a pretty good idea :stop:


:ok: What was going on in their wetware? Lights on, nobody at home?

❝ ❝ how do you deal with PK if you need to calculate partial AUC0-4 ?


In Phoenix no need to worry. Like in this post.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
151 visitors (0 registered, 151 guests [including 32 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5