WTF ? [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2013-09-09 23:26 (4667 d 19:01 ago) – Posting: # 11465
Views: 12,332

Hi John,

❝ 3.5 hr blood draw has time deviation of +41 mins.

❝ 4 hr blood draw has time deviation of +2 mins.


How did they manage to collect the 3.5 hr sample after the 4 hr sample :surprised: ?

❝ how do you deal with PK if you need to calculate partial AUC0-4 ?


With PK, no idea. With the CRO, I have a pretty good idea :stop:

Unless the staff were kept busy by a serious adverse event and had more urgent things to do, I can't see how they managed to f... up that much. Even with a blocked canula they should be able to collect the sample via a fresh venipuncture. Or did they have no spare phlebotomist at hand ?

OK, I know it doesn't help, sorry...

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
155 visitors (0 registered, 155 guests [including 42 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5