Science driven decisions [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-06-28 16:22 (4744 d 09:56 ago) – Posting: # 10900
Views: 6,963

Dear Raghu,

❝ If we give additional water during dosing to a single subject, will it affect the solubility of the product and subsequently on the absorption, pk and stats results. However it depends on the amount of water what we have given.


In fasted state such differences are unlikely. Non-caloric liquids are leaving the stomach within minutes (google for “Magenstrasse”).

❝ If it occurs in P-I, can we give the same amount of additional water to the same subject in next period(s) to avoid variability.


If you want to minimize any potential difference you can do that.

❝ Can we drop the subject from the study, to avoid the queries from the regulatory.


Wrong question. You should ask yourself whether there might be an impact based on scientific grounds. Anticipate such incidents and give a procedure to follow in the protocol. If you haven’t done so, consider performing a sensitivity analysis (with/without the subject) and discuss the potential impact on the BE assessment in the report. “Exlusion to avoid regulatory queries” IMHO is never a good justification.

See this presentation by Werner Weitschies:

Potential impact of excipients and size/shape of dosage form on GI transit
EUFEPS Conference, June 2008, Bad Homburg, Germany


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
115 visitors (0 registered, 115 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5