What a mess! [Software]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2013-01-09 11:33 (4910 d 10:39 ago) – Posting: # 9801
Views: 14,875

Dear Helmut,

❝ In my home-brew BE software I didn’t round at all, but tested for θL ≤ 90% CI ≤ θU.


Me too. From our sponsors perspective it's the better choice and if rounding comes into play it looks much better ;-). In that sense the R rounding is also a good choice.

❝ ❝ … thus we can't empirical test it via simulations.

❝ Not sure what you mean here. :confused:


I meant that simulations with θL ≤ 90% CI ≤ θU do not give substantial different results compared to θL < 90% CI < θU. Thus we can't choose that alternative which is closer to the analytical power calculation results (of course via PowerTOST :cool:).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
146 visitors (0 registered, 146 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5