Rounding [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-01-05 21:13 (4490 d 15:55 ago) – Posting: # 9788
Views: 12,619

Dear Detlew!

❝ ❝ ... In the meantime I finished my balanced cross-over sim’s. n 12–60, CV 6–100%. With my grid I have 306·106 sim’s each. With rounding I got 24 (7.84%) empiric alphas significantly >0.05; without 11 (3.59%).


❝ How do you interpret the un-rounded results?


The jury is out. I ran two sim’s with identical seeds to compare the results. Nice intermediate result files (33.1MB unrounded, 14MB rounded). Have to find a clever way to filter for the suspects.

❝ Empirical evidence of an Alpha inflation of TOST :cool:?

❝ Hopefully not.


Don’t think so. On the other hand it puts occasional significant alphas I got in Methods B/C/D into perspective.

Sim’s are sim’s are sim’s.

It’s like with lab values. The more your physician requests, the more “*” you’ll get – though not being ill. ;-)

❝ Here I have another one:

round(c(1.2500499999999999, 1.250049999999999999), 4)

[1] 1.2500 1.2501


You are a nasty person.

❝ More trouble spots can be found in "The R inferno".

❝ Should be a must-read for all R-users.


Wow!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
22 visitors (0 registered, 22 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5