Rounding [Software]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2013-01-05 20:25 (4914 d 05:58 ago) – Posting: # 9787
Views: 15,073

Dear Helmut!

❝ ... In the meantime I finished my balanced cross-over sim’s. n 12–60, CV 6–100%. With my grid I have 306·106 sim’s each. With rounding I got 24 (7.84%) empiric alphas significantly >0.05; without 11 (3.59%).


How do you interpret the un-rounded results?
Empirical evidence of an Alpha inflation of TOST :cool:?
Hopefully not.

❝ Sometimes R drives me nuts.


Here I have another one:
round(c(1.2500499999999999, 1.250049999999999999), 4)
[1] 1.2500 1.2501


More trouble spots can be found in "The R inferno".
Should be a must-read for all R-users.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
145 visitors (0 registered, 145 guests [including 36 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5