The secret of WinNonlin's BE's post-hoc Power analysis [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-11-08 16:06 (4914 d 16:05 ago) – Posting: # 7638
Views: 10,244

Dear yicaoting,

thanks for stepping into murky waters.

❝ It seems that WNL's post-hoc power calc doesn't directly use Observed Diff or Observed Ratio or intra-CV, only indirectly uses DiffSE and Expected Diff or Ratio such as 0.8, 1,2, 0.8, 1.25. Dear all, True or False of WNL's method?


Fascinating. I’m a little bit busy now, but will have a look as soon as possible.

❝ Dear HS, have you reached Berlin and meet our D. Labes?

  1. Yes.
  2. Tomorrow afternoon. :smoke:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
23 visitors (0 registered, 23 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5