WinNonlin’s BE wizard is known to be buggy [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-11-06 17:53 (5344 d 00:57 ago) – Posting: # 7627
Views: 13,546

Dear yicaoting!

❝ I will be careful with WNL's BE wizard.


Consider upgrading to Phoenix. It’s free of charge and support for ‘classical’ WinNonlin will end soon. In PHX I have set up a workflow running both the BE wiz and LME. Results are compared and if the difference in both CLs is ≤0.01 % (the magic rounding requirement according to FDA and EMA: 80.00 % ≤ CI ≤ 125.00 %) I use BE’s results. Although fancy stuff is included in WNL (M$-Word export) and PHX (+HTML tables) I never use them. Takes ages to set them up – much easier to import the ASCII-text into a statistical report. ;-)

❝ Your suggestion is definitely valuable if one wants to get high-precision results (at least for 90% CI of the ratio).


If you really bother (and after this this post I’m sure you don’t) and have a lot of money to spare you can obtain a Phoenix Connect-license. Then it would be possible to get the t-value from an R-script.

There’s another point on my wishlist: Have you ever tried to reproduce WNL’s reported power in any other piece of software?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
153 visitors (0 registered, 153 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5