Power at 1.20 [Software]

posted by jdetlor – 2010-09-28 22:28 (5320 d 17:06 ago) – Posting: # 5949
Views: 5,888

Dear HS!

❝ Yes, I’ve heard the term ‘forced BE’ also. If WeirdDude really talked about a ratio of 1.20 – well, let’s see what power we would get (24 subjects, usual settings, :blahblah:):

   CV%  power

   5.5  0.8017

  10    0.3932

  20    0.1704

  30    0.1180

❝ Unless one has to deal with the ‘wonder-drug’ (CV 5.5 %), 24 subjects at a ratio of 1.20 are futile.


Don't get me wrong — I am not advocating that planning a study with 20% is by any means acceptable. But, what I am saying is that technically it is possible to demonstrate BE with a ratio of 120%. If you were to plot the observed power vs the p-value, we would only need a power of approximately 34%[1] to have the 90% BE confidence interval to fall within the BE limits, which puts us (according to the table) at a CV of about 11%.

[1] See Figure 1 in The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis

J. Detlor

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
22 visitors (0 registered, 22 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5