Power at 1.20 [Software]

posted by jdetlor – 2010-09-28 22:28 (5743 d 10:29 ago) – Posting: # 5949
Views: 7,127

Dear HS!

❝ Yes, I’ve heard the term ‘forced BE’ also. If WeirdDude really talked about a ratio of 1.20 – well, let’s see what power we would get (24 subjects, usual settings, :blahblah:):

   CV%  power

   5.5  0.8017

  10    0.3932

  20    0.1704

  30    0.1180

❝ Unless one has to deal with the ‘wonder-drug’ (CV 5.5 %), 24 subjects at a ratio of 1.20 are futile.


Don't get me wrong — I am not advocating that planning a study with 20% is by any means acceptable. But, what I am saying is that technically it is possible to demonstrate BE with a ratio of 120%. If you were to plot the observed power vs the p-value, we would only need a power of approximately 34%[1] to have the 90% BE confidence interval to fall within the BE limits, which puts us (according to the table) at a CV of about 11%.

[1] See Figure 1 in The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis

J. Detlor

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
136 visitors (0 registered, 136 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5