Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Validation POV... [Software]

posted by Helmut  – Vienna, Austria, 2010-04-05 23:39 (5917 d 16:00 ago) – Posting: # 5024
Views: 9,999

Hi Simon!

❝ I think Helmut's point is that if you use the Validation Suite and IF there were actual calculation errors in the Reference sets then these would not be identified.

Exactly. I don't think that any vendor would write a validation pack in such a way that known problems are not detected. One the other hand if the vendor is confident that the correct result of 2×2 is 5, (s)he would test exactly for that result.
My original post referred to the funny idea to compare the output on the screen pixel-by-pixel to the reference machine's. I know this rather 'innovative' approach to software validation was abandoned in the meantime.
BTW, what a coincidence: just returning form a three-hours escapade at Pharsight's extranet. I would bet that the Validation Suite 'believes' PHX's bloody a posteriori power is correct (see also this oldie).

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! 
Helmut Schütz


The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

• WinNonlin PQ ramesh_7779 2010-04-02 16:36 
  • WinNonlin PQ Jaime_R 2010-04-02 17:00
    • WinNonlin PQ ramesh_7779 2010-04-03 18:11
      • WinNonlin PQ Jaime_R 2010-04-03 23:09
        • WinNonlin PQ ramesh_7779 2010-04-04 09:19
      • WinNonlin PQ Nirali 2010-04-05 08:52
        • WinNonlin PQ Jaime_R 2010-04-05 15:33
        • WinNonlin PQ ramesh_7779 2010-04-05 15:57
          • No e-mail in the forum! Helmut 2010-04-05 16:04
          • WinNonlin PQ SDavis 2010-04-05 20:02
            • Validation POV...Helmut 2010-04-05 21:39
        • WinNonlin PQ ramesh_7779 2010-07-10 12:20
          • Canada... Jaime_R 2010-07-11 19:40