WinNonlin PQ [Software]

posted by Nirali – India, 2010-04-05 10:52 (5919 d 20:52 ago) – Posting: # 5018
Views: 10,028

(edited on 2010-04-05 14:18)

Dear Mr. Raja,

As per my knowledge, Regulatory looks for proper Installation, Operations and Performance of the software to assure that analysis has been carried out using valid procedures/equations/formulas.

I have faced audit from regulatory like- ANVISA, USFDA, FRANCE.
Definitely they may ask "Are you using validated software or validated programs?"

❝ We used to compare the result from winnonlin with results from excel (Validated Excel). I feeded the formula in excel which i have taken fromula from winnonlin help.


Instead of doing above exercise with another software-Microsoft Excel, you may validate your Procedures / programs by comparing your software results with reference data available in the published Books/Articles/guidelines.

For Example:
Health Canada Guidelines: "Guidance for Industry: Conduct and Analysis of Bio-availability and Bio-equivalence Studies - Part B: Oral Modified Release Formulations" contains complete data sets and its statistical analysis for Bio-equivalence. You may validate Bio-equivalence analysis of your software by comparing its output with this guideline output using data set given in it.

Same way, you may take data and its analysis from the book/articles and validate it with your software output :-)

I have documented PQ of WinNonlin and few programs of SAS as per above example and it is accepted by regulatory auditors.


Thanks & Regards,
Nirali

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
132 visitors (0 registered, 132 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5