Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Proc Mixed for a non-replicate design [Software]

posted by kev – 2010-03-26 11:42 (5933 d 22:48 ago) – Posting: # 4976
Views: 4,713

Many thanks Gents. Both of you're replies seem to support my basic suspicion with the design theory here, that switching from a replicate design to a 4-way-crosssover to confirm treatment effects is a no-go.

Complete thread:

Proc Mixed for a replicate design kev 2010-03-25 16:35
- Posthoc comparisons Helmut 2010-03-25 18:34
- Proc Mixed for a non-replicate design d_labes 2010-03-26 08:48
  - Proc Mixed for a non-replicate designkev 2010-03-26 10:42

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
173 visitors (0 registered, 173 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution. Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz