Proc Mixed for a non-replicate design [Software]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-03-26 09:48 (5930 d 23:39 ago) – Posting: # 4974
Views: 4,676

Dear Kev,

❝ Have a working SAS model for a replicate design, 2 treatments, 4 periods

❝ (each treatment is delivered twice).


:confused: What is your working model? FDA code?

❝ Now need to do followup analysis on the 4 individual treatment

❝ comparisons

❝ A1vA2

❝ B1vB2

❝ A1vB1

❝ A2vB2


Agree with Helmut. Seems to me not the right question within a replicate design.

If you really like to consider the two replicates of Test (A) and Reference (B) as distinct (but why?) you don't have a replicate design anymore.

It's then a 4-treatment-4-period-x-sequence design.

Have a look into some textbook to find out:
The model for the 4-treatment-4-period-whatever-sequence design is the same as for the usual 2x2 cross-over.

If you prefer Proc Mixed over Proc GLM (but beware of regulatory 'constraints' if your evaluation is deemed as submission to the EMA, see here):

Proc MIXED data=yourdata;
  class tmt sequence period subject;
  model logPK = tmt sequence period /ddfm=KR;
  random subject(sequence);
*The LSMeans statement will give you all comparisons you think you need;
  LSMeans tmt/diff CL alpha=0.1;
run;


But beware that you have coded your replicate treatments as A1,A2 and B1,B2 and your sequences accordingly.

[image] if you know ;-).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
118 visitors (0 registered, 118 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5