Proc Mixed for a non-replicate design [Software]
Dear Kev,
What is your working model? FDA code?
Agree with Helmut. Seems to me not the right question within a replicate design.
If you really like to consider the two replicates of Test (A) and Reference (B) as distinct (but why?) you don't have a replicate design anymore.
It's then a 4-treatment-4-period-x-sequence design.
Have a look into some textbook to find out:
The model for the 4-treatment-4-period-whatever-sequence design is the same as for the usual 2x2 cross-over.
If you prefer Proc Mixed over Proc GLM (but beware of regulatory 'constraints' if your evaluation is deemed as submission to the EMA, see here):
But beware that you have coded your replicate treatments as A1,A2 and B1,B2 and your sequences accordingly.
if you know
.
❝ Have a working SAS model for a replicate design, 2 treatments, 4 periods
❝ (each treatment is delivered twice).
What is your working model? FDA code?❝ Now need to do followup analysis on the 4 individual treatment
❝ comparisons
❝ A1vA2
❝ B1vB2
❝ A1vB1
❝ A2vB2
Agree with Helmut. Seems to me not the right question within a replicate design.
If you really like to consider the two replicates of Test (A) and Reference (B) as distinct (but why?) you don't have a replicate design anymore.
It's then a 4-treatment-4-period-x-sequence design.
Have a look into some textbook to find out:
The model for the 4-treatment-4-period-whatever-sequence design is the same as for the usual 2x2 cross-over.
If you prefer Proc Mixed over Proc GLM (but beware of regulatory 'constraints' if your evaluation is deemed as submission to the EMA, see here):
Proc MIXED data=yourdata;
class tmt sequence period subject;
model logPK = tmt sequence period /ddfm=KR;
random subject(sequence);
*The LSMeans statement will give you all comparisons you think you need;
LSMeans tmt/diff CL alpha=0.1;
run;But beware that you have coded your replicate treatments as A1,A2 and B1,B2 and your sequences accordingly.
if you know
.—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- Proc Mixed for a replicate design kev 2010-03-25 16:35
- Posthoc comparisons Helmut 2010-03-25 18:34
- Proc Mixed for a non-replicate designd_labes 2010-03-26 08:48
- Proc Mixed for a non-replicate design kev 2010-03-26 10:42
