about Parallel Study Design (SAS) [Software]

posted by yuvrajkatkar – Pune, Maharashtra (India), 2009-10-07 12:11 (6083 d 14:54 ago) – Posting: # 4311
Views: 11,329

Dear Sir,
In our two-treatment, single-period parallel bioequivalence study of Iron Sucrose Injection, effects for treatments and drug formulations as factors in the statistical model.

Please see the below SAS code for Two-Way crossover design.

Without group effect SAS code for two way crossover design

PROC GLM
class sub form seq per;
model Cmax=seq sub(seq) form per;
test h=seq e=sub(seq);
lsmeans form/stderr pdiff singular=.5 out=cmax_form;
lsmeans per/stderr  pdiff singular=.5 out=cmax_per;
contrast 'T vs R' form -1 1;
estimate 'test-ref' form -1 1;
run;


Group effect sas code for two way crossover design

PROC GLM
class group seq subject period form;
model cmax=period group seq  group*seq subject(group*seq) period(group) group*form form /CLparm Alpha=.10;
     Test H=group E=subject(group*Seq);
     Test H=seq E=subject(group*seq);
     contrast 'T vs R' form -1 1;
     Estimate 'Test - Reference' form 1 -1;
     Lsmeans group/stderr pdiff E=subject(group*seq);
     Lsmeans seq/stderr pdiff E=subject(group*seq);
     Lsmeans period(Group)/Stderr Pdiff ;
     Lsmeans form/Stderr Pdiff singular=.5 out=cmax_form;
     Random subject(group*seq);
run;


So, please suggest me which changes should be made for parallel design with and without group effect.

Best Regards,
Yuvraj

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
418 visitors (0 registered, 418 guests [including 43 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5