No paper, pencil, brain :-( [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-09-22 20:22 (5692 d 07:48 ago) – Posting: # 4231
Views: 29,259

Dear Yuvraj!

❝ 90% CI for Upper limit=1.329927721 which is nearly equal to 1.33 [image]

❝ 90% CI for Lower limit=1.07998416 which is nearly equal to 1.08 [image]


❝ Is it right, Sir?


Oops, you got me! :ok:
You are rightand I am wrong.
If I use values with no rounding I get exactly 1.08 and 1.33 up to the numeric precision of my machine.
Lesion learned: Never trust in an old fart with a pocket calculator too lazy to fire up some statistical software.
Terribly sorry for the confusion…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5