ADJUST does not adjust [Software]

posted by vijay – 2009-04-21 18:10 (5846 d 12:11 ago) – Posting: # 3577
Views: 7,328

Dear d_labes,
Thanks for the clarification. I would like to rephrase question 3 as it seems I did not get the correct message out.
Considering I am using only the LSMEANS option for differences between more than 2 treatments (lets say: A-B, B-C & A-C) then, "I often see similar standard errors for each of those differences even though their point estimates may be very different" I am citing an example output from chapter 4 of “Bioequivalence and Statistics in Clinical Pharmacology by Patterson and Jones”); Example 4.5 for 3 treatments
         Differences of Least Squares Means

                                              Standard
Effect     formula    _formula    Estimate       Error     
formula    R          S            -0.3410     0.03851     
formula    R          T            -0.1497     0.03849     
formula    S          T             0.1912     0.03871


I removed the last few columns of the code, but the output comes from this statement;
  lsmeans formula/pdiff cl alpha=0.1;.

This is at least one case where the standard errors differ in the 3rd decimal place, but more than often I see the same standard errors. I am just curious as to why this happens?

Regarding the last point, Thanks HS. I will search more before I get back.

Thanks,
Vijay

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5