Pharsight = Far Side? [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2006-10-05 14:51 (7194 d 00:24 ago) – Posting: # 276
Views: 9,518

Hi PKPDFX, nice nick ;-)

OK, just to stay inline with WinNonlin’s nomenclature:IMHO your model specification ‘subject+period+sequence+sex+bw’ is correct.
I just reproduced your results with both WinNonlin 4.1 and the current version, 5.0.1: no difference in results. :-(

I remember that I’ve tried to include covariates in BE a couple of years ago and failed as well.
I put it on my ‘to-do-list’, and left it there until today…

Sorry, no better news, consider contacting Pharsight’s support—and post the answer to the forum (I’m curious as well).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
207 visitors (0 registered, 207 guests [including 86 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5