Pharsight = Far Side? [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2006-10-05 14:51 (6790 d 04:38 ago) – Posting: # 276
Views: 8,074

Hi PKPDFX, nice nick ;-)

OK, just to stay inline with WinNonlin’s nomenclature:IMHO your model specification ‘subject+period+sequence+sex+bw’ is correct.
I just reproduced your results with both WinNonlin 4.1 and the current version, 5.0.1: no difference in results. :-(

I remember that I’ve tried to include covariates in BE a couple of years ago and failed as well.
I put it on my ‘to-do-list’, and left it there until today…

Sorry, no better news, consider contacting Pharsight’s support—and post the answer to the forum (I’m curious as well).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
180 visitors (0 registered, 180 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5