SAP? [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-03 19:31 (2162 d 05:21 ago) – Posting: # 21649
Views: 9,091

Hi Mahmoud,

❝ Dear Dr


Still not a doctor. Told you before.

❝ in This study I found that and for Cmax Pk that

❝ CVintra =27.3217 and CVinter=20.7271 this is not true in BE studies


Truth does not belong to the realm of science. :-D

❝ From most studies CVinter is more more than CVintra


Correct; sometimes CVintra > CVinter.

❝ I think that the two types=CSH or FA0(1) in the FDA code are not suitable to obtain these results


Why, can you elaborate?

❝ ❝ Are you trying to “safe” a failed study?

❝ No


I see. Please answer my other question (also in the subject line) as well:

❝ ❝ What is stated in the SAP?

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
358 visitors (0 registered, 358 guests [including 60 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5