Common sense instead of statistics [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-04-27 13:45 (2229 d 06:04 ago) – Posting: # 21351
Views: 11,868

Hi vixen,

❝ I like Helmut's suggestion to assess achievement of SS for individual subjects.


My suggestion dates back to 2007. A while ago…
I don’t use it since 2010 and don’t recommend it any more (see this presentation, slide 14). Furthermore, the EMA stated:*

A specific statistical method to assure that steady state has been reached is not considered necessary in bioequivalence studies. Descriptive data is sufficient.


❝ I wonder though whether I should evaluate the Cpds on a normal or logarithmic scale.


Normal – otherwise you cannot deal with BQLs and missings.

❝ What is your approach?


See the presentation.



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
118 visitors (0 registered, 118 guests [including 34 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5